Women In Art
Women In Film
- Phillip Scott Johnson
Posted to his Youtube account, 2007
-
Subscribe
-
What Is WhatIsntArt.net?
This is a slowly building searchable database of words and media on the nature of art. It is intended for use as a discussion aid and educational resource. -
Contribute
Please contribute! If you have found a quote, book, video, or any other content you think is inspiring or challenging, send it in. If you would like to create a response of any kind, email it along with your name, what you do, and when the response was created.
An example would be Marcel Duchamp, Artist, 1917.
You can be as specific as you like or as abstract. Content can range from academic and analytical to personal and humorous.
Mail all contributions, feedback, and questions to: contribute@whatisntart.net.
Anyone and everyone is also encouraged to discuss through the comments as well! -
On Excerpts
Quotations and excerpts are selective. The content here will ideally be fair to the intent of the originators, but the ideas will always be best understood in context of their original source.
Many of the sources are not online and some are out of print, but whatisntart.net will do its best to provide. If a link doesn't work, a better source is available, or something is wrong, feel free to tip us off in a comment or by email. -
Recent Posts
- Michael and Koko, Gorillas, 1983
- Jörg M. Colberg, Artist/Critic, 2008
- Timothy Tang, Author, 2008
- Jonathan Harris, Computer Scientist/Artist, 2008
- Salvador Dali, Artist, 1957
- Various, WIA Facebook Group, 2008
- Morgan Scott Peck, Psychiatrist/Author, 1978
- Tullio Francesco DeSantis, Artist, 2007
- Vicki Goldberg, Writer, 1981
- Milton Glaser, Graphic Designer, 2007
- Joseph Beuys, Artist, 1970
- Susan Sontag, Writer, 1964
- Ira Isaacs, Director, 2008
- Elizabeth Anderson, Stylist, 2006
- Oscar Wilde, Writer, 1890
Archives
-
Further Discussion
One Comment
I find these two pieces very interesting.
What does his choice of music say about his feelings about the subject matter and how it should be treated? His method and speed of changing the images?
And, more importantly, his selection of images. Is it a commentary on trends in art over a period of 500 years or is it his view of what should be thought of as beautiful and aesthetically pleasing?
Perhaps the selection in the second is more telling. What is left out may be just as important, or more, than what is included.
Post a Comment